Stationary vs. Moving Clocks
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" - Richard Feynman ( 1918 - 1988 )
§ Assume: system is moving "inside" stationary
system with velocity
and is carrying the following clock consisting of a light - flash source and a receiving photocell. One "clock tick" consists of a roundtrip light - flash and photocell reception:
suggested source of diagram: Richard Feynman's " Lectures on Physics - Vol. I "
Employing simple algebra for the above Stationary Clock (a) in system versus Moving Clock (b) in
system, we get the following:
So as
What this all means is that as viewed from within Stationary system , time in Moving system
will appear to move more slowly - i.e., relative units of time become comparatively expanded - as relative velocity
increases as between Stationary system and Moving system
.
Inside the Moving system , rest time
however moves at a "normal rate".
In conclusion, any "moving clock" moving at a uniform velocity in an inertial ( non - accelerating ) frame of reference relative to a stationary observer's clock will therefore appear to run slower!
§ Time dilation:
This concept of relativistic time dilation in special relativity is also shown in this American Museum of Natural History - "A Matter of Time" movie as well as PBS's NOVA Science program of the 1971 time dilation experiment aboard a transatlantic British Airways flight:
source: American Museum of Natural History - "A Matter of Time"
[ note: for those who cannot view this page whole, see quicktime movie ]
source: PBS's NOVA Science - "Time Dilation Experiment, 1971"
[ note: for those who cannot view this page whole, see quicktime or flash movie ]
Observed Facts: Flying eastward and then westward from the stationary U.S. Naval Observatory, General Relativity predicted a time loss of 40 ± 23 nonoseconds on the eastward bound and a time gain of 275 ± 21 nanoseconds for the westward trip; the actual eastward loss was 59 ± 10 nanoseconds going eastward but gained 273 ± 7 nanoseconds for the westward trip!!
§ Another derivation partially using both (c) above and referring back to "Albert A. Michelson & the Aether-Part II":
§ Please also refer back to "Albert A. Michelson & the Aether-Part II" as the mathematics is identical although the problem herein is subtly different.
![]() [ Mail this page to a friend ] |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Your ip address is: 44.197.101.251 This document was last modified on: (none) Your browser is: CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/) Domains: relativitycalculator.com, relativityphysics.com, relativityscience.com, relativitysciencecalculator.com, einsteinrelativityphysicstheory.com Urls: https://www.relativitycalculator.com, http://www.relativityphysics.com, http://www.relativityscience.com, http://www.relativitysciencecalculator.com, http://www.einsteinrelativityphysicstheory.com ss |
![]() note: for a secure encrypted connection |
html sitemap | visual sitemap | shopping cart sitemap | shopping cart
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.